| trigger | what | default if you say nothing |
|---|
| SYSTEMATIC_PATTERN | Is the recurring objection a real doctrinal limit on what we can underwrite, or a gap in the evidence we assemble? | Treat it as an evidence gap and log a build task; do NOT cap conviction without an explici |
| MANDATE_SHORTFALL | Is this the gates working correctly, or is coverage too thin to run the mandate? And do you want the cash held, or the universe widened first? | Hold the cash and widen coverage. §10: the system reports the shortfall and does not reach |
| DIMENSION_DEADLOCK | Which dimension should size AMD versus ARM? Or should the pair be treated as one position and sized on the weaker of the two? | Keep the analyst's ranking but cap AMD at the weight the quant ranking would justify — i.e |
| DIMENSION_DEADLOCK | Which dimension should size GOOGL versus META? Or should the pair be treated as one position and sized on the weaker of the two? | Keep the analyst's ranking but cap GOOGL at the weight the quant ranking would justify — i |
| DIMENSION_DEADLOCK | Which dimension should size INTC versus ARM? Or should the pair be treated as one position and sized on the weaker of the two? | Keep the analyst's ranking but cap INTC at the weight the quant ranking would justify — i. |
| DIMENSION_DEADLOCK | Which dimension should size QCOM versus ARM? Or should the pair be treated as one position and sized on the weaker of the two? | Keep the analyst's ranking but cap QCOM at the weight the quant ranking would justify — i. |
| DIMENSION_DEADLOCK | Which dimension should size MU versus 000660.KS? Or should the pair be treated as one position and sized on the weaker of the two? | Keep the analyst's ranking but cap MU at the weight the quant ranking would justify — i.e. |
| DIMENSION_DEADLOCK | Which dimension should size 8035.T versus 6146.T? Or should the pair be treated as one position and sized on the weaker of the two? | Keep the analyst's ranking but cap 8035.T at the weight the quant ranking would justify — |